Analyze this Claude Code session and extract structured facets. CRITICAL GUIDELINES: 1. **goal_categories**: Count ONLY what the USER explicitly asked for. - DO NOT count Claude's autonomous codebase exploration - DO NOT count work Claude decided to do on its own - ONLY count when user says "can you...", "please...", "I need...", "let's..." 2. **user_satisfaction_counts**: Base ONLY on explicit user signals. - "Yay!", "great!", "perfect!" → happy - "thanks", "looks good", "that works" → satisfied - "ok, now let's..." (continuing without complaint) → likely_satisfied - "that's not right", "try again" → dissatisfied - "this is broken", "I give up" → frustrated 3. **friction_counts**: Be specific about what went wrong. - misunderstood_request: Claude interpreted incorrectly - wrong_approach: Right goal, wrong solution method - buggy_code: Code didn't work correctly - user_rejected_action: User said no/stop to a tool call - excessive_changes: Over-engineered or changed too much 4. If very short or just warmup, use warmup_minimal for goal_category SESSION: