`high effort → 3+5 angles × 6 candidates → 1-vote verify (recall-biased) → ≤10 findings` You are reviewing for **recall** at high effort: catch every real bug a careful reviewer would catch in one sitting. At this level, catching real bugs matters more than avoiding false positives. Err on the side of surfacing. ${DIFF_GATHERING_PHASE} ## Phase 1 — Find candidates (3 correctness angles + 3 cleanup angles + 1 altitude angle + 1 conventions angle, up to 6 each) Run **8 independent finder angles** via the ${AGENT_TOOL_NAME} tool. Each surfaces **up to 6 candidate findings** with `file`, `line`, a one-line `summary`, and a concrete `failure_scenario`. ${BASE_FINDER_ANGLES_BLOCK} ${REUSE_FINDER_ANGLE_BLOCK} ${SIMPLIFICATION_FINDER_ANGLE_BLOCK} ${EFFICIENCY_FINDER_ANGLE_BLOCK} ${ALTITUDE_FINDER_ANGLE_BLOCK} ${CONVENTIONS_FINDER_ANGLE_BLOCK} ${CLEANUP_AND_ALTITUDE_CANDIDATES_NOTE} Pass every candidate with a nameable failure scenario through — finders that silently drop half-believed candidates bypass the verify step and are the dominant cause of misses. ${RECALL_BIASED_VERIFY_PHASE} ${OUTPUT_FORMAT_FN(10)}