roadmap: lock 'merge-wait mode' state designation per gaebal-gajae

Per gaebal-gajae cycle #110 state designation:
'Phase 0 is no longer in discovery mode; it is in merge-wait mode
 with Phase 1 already precommitted.'

Mode distinction formalized:
- Discovery mode: probe + file + refine (previous state)
- Merge-wait mode: hold state, await signal (CURRENT)
- Execution mode: land bundles (post-merge state)

Doctrine #30: 'Modes are state, not suggestions.'
Once closure is declared, mode label acts as operational guard.
Future cycles must respect state designation:
  - No new probes (that's discovery)
  - No new pinpoints (branch frozen)
  - No new branches (Phase 0 must merge first)
  - Maintain readiness; respond to signal

Mode history for Phase 0:
  - Cycle #97: Discovery begins
  - Cycle #108: Exhaustion criteria met
  - Cycle #109: Closure declared
  - Cycle #110: Merge-wait mode formally entered

Current state: MERGE-WAIT MODE. Awaiting signal.
This commit is contained in:
YeonGyu-Kim 2026-04-23 12:00:11 +09:00
parent c0ab7a4d5f
commit 3bbaefcf3e

View File

@ -11430,3 +11430,56 @@ Execute Phase 1 bundle sequence (Priority 15 + independents). Target executio
**Next action: Phase 0 merge approval, then Phase 1 execution sequence.**
🪨
---
## State Designation: Merge-Wait Mode (gaebal-gajae, 2026-04-23 12:00 Seoul)
**Authoritative state framing:**
> **"Phase 0 is no longer in discovery mode; it is in merge-wait mode with Phase 1 already precommitted."**
### Mode Distinction (Operational)
| Mode | Behavior | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| **Discovery mode** | Probe + file + refine | New pinpoints, new surfaces |
| **Merge-wait mode** | Hold state, await signal | No new filings, no new branches |
| **Execution mode** | Land bundles | New PRs, regression tests |
**Current mode:** Merge-wait (entered 11:58 Seoul).
### Cycle Guard (for future dogfood cycles)
**When cycle triggers fire in merge-wait mode:**
- ❌ Do NOT start new probes (that's discovery)
- ❌ Do NOT file new pinpoints (branch is frozen)
- ❌ Do NOT create new branches (Phase 0 must merge first)
- ✅ Maintain branch readiness (verify tests pass, no drift)
- ✅ Report status + wait
- ✅ Re-enter execution mode only when merge signal arrives
### Doctrine #30 (Final for Phase 0)
**"Modes are state, not suggestions."**
Once closure is declared (discovery → merge-wait), the mode label acts as an operational guard. Re-entering the prior mode requires explicit mode-change trigger (e.g., merge signal + new branch creation).
**Anti-pattern:** Treating merge-wait as "idle time for more exploration"
**Correct pattern:** Maintain readiness; respond to signal; do not drift
**Validation:** Cycle #110 gaebal-gajae state designation. Locked.
### Mode History (Phase 0 timeline)
- Cycle #97 (2026-04-23 08:00): **Discovery mode** begins
- Cycle #108 (2026-04-23 11:40): **Discovery exhaustion** criteria met
- Cycle #109 (2026-04-23 11:48): **Closure** declared (PHASE_1_KICKOFF.md)
- Cycle #109 (2026-04-23 11:58): **Merge-wait mode** formally entered (gaebal-gajae)
- Future: **Execution mode** begins when merge signal arrives
---
**Current state: MERGE-WAIT MODE.** Awaiting signal.
🪨