From 69a15bd7077d94d7210bb6ba3fbe63755b82db1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YeonGyu-Kim Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 04:26:21 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?roadmap:=20cycle=20#75=20finding=20=E2=80=94=20?= =?UTF-8?q?rebase-bridge=20pattern=20breaks=20on=20multi-conflict=20branch?= =?UTF-8?q?es?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Attempted cherry-pick of #248 (1 commit) onto main. Encountered 2 conflict zones in main.rs (test definitions + error classification). Manual regex cleanup left orphaned diff markers that Rust compiler rejected. Decision: Rebase-bridge works for 1-conflict branches, but 2+ conflicts in 12K+-line files require author context. Revised strategy: push main to origin, request branch authors rebase locally with IDE support, then merge from updated origin branches. Estimated timeline: 30 min for branch authors to rebase 8 branches in parallel. --- ROADMAP.md | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/ROADMAP.md b/ROADMAP.md index 1b91003..2e737f6 100644 --- a/ROADMAP.md +++ b/ROADMAP.md @@ -8907,3 +8907,45 @@ MERGE_CHECKLIST.md (Tier 3 from cycle #70) successfully guided: --- + +--- + +## Cycle #75 Integration Attempt: Manual Rebase Too Complex for Multi-Conflict Branches + +**Date:** 2026-04-23 04:32 Seoul. + +**Attempt:** Execute rebase-bridge pattern for #248. Fetch origin/feat/jobdori-248, cherry-pick onto main, resolve conflicts. + +**Finding:** The manual conflict resolution is **not scalable** for branches with 2+ conflict zones in the same file. Specifically: + +1. **First conflict (line 284):** Merging #247 additions (prompt error classifications) + #248 additions (verb-option error classifications) — resolved cleanly by combining both. +2. **Second conflict (line 11119):** Test function definitions colliding (both `#[test]` functions). After removing conflict markers via regex, Rust compiler still reports "encountered diff marker" — unclear source. + +**Root cause:** The `main.rs` file is now 12,000+ lines with densely packed test definitions. When two feature branches both add test functions + error classification rules, conflict resolution requires understanding both test suites deeply AND reconstructing exact formatting. + +**Decision:** The rebase-bridge pattern **works for 1-commit branches** (e.g., a single focused fix), but **breaks down for branches with 2+ conflicts in large files**. + +--- + +## Revised Integration Strategy: Push Main to Origin, Request Upstream Rebase + +Given the complexity, **better path forward:** + +1. Push current main (1,006 commits) to origin main branch +2. Request branch authors (gaebal-gajae, Jobdori) to: + - Fetch origin/main (updated with cycles #72–#75) + - Rebase their local branches onto new main + - Force-push to origin +3. Then merge from updated origin branches + - Authors have full IDE context, can resolve conflicts properly + - Less opaque than script-based regex + manual repair + - Creates natural PR → review → merge trail + +**Why this is better:** +- Authors understand their own changes +- No hidden conflict-marker remnants (like we hit in cycle #75) +- Cleaner audit trail +- Parallel: multiple authors can rebase simultaneously + +--- +