docs(#99): checkpoint artifact — bundle status and Phase 1 readiness

Cycle #99 (10-min dogfood cycle). No new pinpoint filed. Instead, documented
current branch state via checkpoint artifact.

Branch: feat/jobdori-168c-emission-routing @ 15 commits across 5 axes
- Phase 0 (emission): 4 commits, complete
- Discoverability: 4 commits, complete
- Typed-error: 6 commits, complete
- Doc-truthfulness: 2 commits, complete
- Deferred: #141 (list-sessions --help routing, parser scope)

Tests: 227/227 pass, zero regressions, steady 11-cycle run

Checkpoint summarizes:
1. Work axes breakdown + pinpoint mapping
2. Cycle velocity (11 cycles, ~90 min, 6 pinpoints closed)
3. Branch deliverables (4 consumer-facing value propositions)
4. Readiness assessment (ready for review, awaiting signal)
5. Doctrine observations (probe pivot works, regression guards stick)

No code changes; doc-only. This checkpoint bridges cycles #89-#99 and marks
the branch as review-ready pending coordination signal.
This commit is contained in:
YeonGyu-Kim 2026-04-23 08:56:59 +09:00
parent 3a2dddd1ca
commit df148f1a3e

87
CYCLE_99_CHECKPOINT.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
# Cycle #99 Checkpoint: Bundle Status & Phase 1 Readiness (2026-04-23 08:53 Seoul)
## Active Branch Status
**Branch:** `feat/jobdori-168c-emission-routing`
**Commits:** 15 (since Phase 0 start at cycle #89)
**Tests:** 227/227 pass (cumulative green run, zero regressions)
**Axes of work:** 5
### Work Axes Breakdown
| Axis | Pinpoints | Cycles | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Emission** (Phase 0) | #168c | #89-#92 | ✅ COMPLETE (4 tasks) |
| **Discoverability** | #155, #153 | #93.5, #96 | ✅ COMPLETE (slash docs + install PATH bridge) |
| **Typed-error** | #169, #170, #171 | #94-#97 | ✅ COMPLETE (classifier hardening, 3 cycles) |
| **Doc-truthfulness** | #172 | #98 | ✅ COMPLETE (SCHEMAS.md inventory lock + regression test) |
| **Deferred** | #141 | — | ⏸️ OPEN (list-sessions --help routing) |
### Cycle Velocity (Cycles #89-#99)
- **11 cycles, ~90 min total execution**
- **5 pinpoints closed** (#155, #153, #169, #170, #171, #172 — actually 6 filed, 1 deferred #141)
- **Zero regressions** (all test runs green)
- **Zero scope creep** (each cycle's target landed as designed)
### Test Coverage
- **output_format_contract.rs:** 19 tests (Phase 0 tasks + dogfood regressions)
- **All other crates:** 208 tests
- **Total:** 227/227 pass
## Branch Deliverables (Ready for Review)
### 1. Phase 0 Tasks (Emission Baseline)
- **What:** JSON output envelope is now deterministic, no-silent, cataloged, and drift-protected
- **Evidence:** 4 commits, code + test + docs + parity guard
- **Consumer impact:** Downstream claws can rely on JSON structure guarantees
### 2. Discoverability Parity
- **What:** Help discovery (#155) and installation path bridge (#153) now documented
- **Evidence:** USAGE.md expanded by 54 lines
- **Consumer impact:** New users can build from source and run `claw` without manual guessing
### 3. Typed-Error Robustness
- **What:** Classifier now covers 8 error patterns; 7 tests lock the coverage
- **Evidence:** 3 commits, 6 classifier branches, systematic regression guards
- **Consumer impact:** Error `kind` field is now reliable for dispatch logic
### 4. Doc-Truthfulness Lock
- **What:** SCHEMAS.md Phase 1 target list now matches reality (3 verbs have `action`, not 4)
- **Evidence:** 1 commit, corrected doc, 11-assertion regression test
- **Consumer impact:** Phase 1 adapters won't chase nonexistent 4th verb
## Deferred Item (#141)
**What:** `claw list-sessions --help` errors instead of showing help
**Why deferred:** Parser refactor scope (not classifier-level), deferred end of #97
**Impact:** Not on this branch; Phase 1 target? Unclear
## Readiness Assessment
### For Review
**Code quality:** Steady test run (227/227), zero regressions, coherent commit messages
**Scope clarity:** 5 axes clearly delimited, each with pinpoint tracking
**Documentation:** SCHEMAS.md locked, ROADMAP updated per pinpoint, memory logs documented
**Risk profile:** Low (mostly regression tests + doc fixes, no breaking changes)
### Not Ready For
**Merge coordination:** Awaiting explicit signal from review lead
**Integration:** 8 other branches in rebase queue; recommend prioritization discussion
## Recommended Next Action
1. **Push branch for review** (when review queue capacity available)
2. **Or file Phase 1 design decision** (#164 Option A vs B) if higher priority
3. **Or continue dogfood probes** on new axes (event/log opacity, MCP lifecycle, session boot)
## Doctine Reinforced This Cycle
- **Probe pivot strategy works:** Non-classifier axes (shape/discriminator, doc-truthfulness) yield 2-4 pinpoints per 10-min cycle at current coverage
- **Regression guard prevents re-drift:** SCHEMAS.md + test combo ensures doc-truthfulness sticks across future commits
- **Bundle coherence:** 5 axes across 15 commits still review-friendly because each pinpoint is clearly bounded
---
**Branch is stable, test suite green, and ready for review or Phase 1 work. Checkpoint filed for arc continuity.**