mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-06-13 14:23:35 +08:00
feat: add orch-* orchestrator skill family (#2153)
* feat: add orch-* orchestrator skill family Lightweight wrappers that orchestrate existing ECC agents through a gated Research -> Plan -> TDD -> Review -> Commit pipeline, right-sized per task. - orch-pipeline: shared engine (phases, size classifier, two gates, agent map) - orch-add-feature/change-feature/fix-defect/refine-code/build-mvp: thin wrappers delegating to the engine * chore: register orch-* family in catalog, command registry, and agent.yaml (post-rebase onto green main) --------- Co-authored-by: ECC Test <ecc@example.test>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e755c5f72b
commit
90dfd9505d
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "ecc",
|
||||
"source": "./",
|
||||
"description": "Harness-native ECC operator layer - 64 agents, 255 skills, 79 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, selective install profiles, and production-ready workflows for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and related agent harnesses",
|
||||
"description": "Harness-native ECC operator layer - 64 agents, 261 skills, 84 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, selective install profiles, and production-ready workflows for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and related agent harnesses",
|
||||
"version": "2.0.0-rc.1",
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"name": "Affaan Mustafa",
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "ecc",
|
||||
"version": "2.0.0-rc.1",
|
||||
"description": "Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 64 agents, 255 skills, 79 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses",
|
||||
"description": "Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 64 agents, 261 skills, 84 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses",
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"name": "Affaan Mustafa",
|
||||
"url": "https://x.com/affaanmustafa"
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 64 specialized agents, 255 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
|
||||
This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 64 specialized agents, 261 skills, 84 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
|
||||
|
||||
**Version:** 2.0.0-rc.1
|
||||
|
||||
@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementat
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
agents/ — 64 specialized subagents
|
||||
skills/ — 255 workflow skills and domain knowledge
|
||||
commands/ — 79 slash commands
|
||||
skills/ — 261 workflow skills and domain knowledge
|
||||
commands/ — 84 slash commands
|
||||
hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
|
||||
rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
|
||||
scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
|
||||
|
||||
12
README.md
12
README.md
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ This repo is the raw code only. The guides explain everything.
|
||||
### v2.0.0-rc.1 — Surface Refresh, Operator Workflows, and ECC 2.0 Alpha (Apr 2026)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dashboard GUI** — New Tkinter-based desktop application (`ecc_dashboard.py` or `npm run dashboard`) with dark/light theme toggle, font customization, and project logo in header and taskbar.
|
||||
- **Public surface synced to the live repo** — metadata, catalog counts, plugin manifests, and install-facing docs now match the actual OSS surface: 64 agents, 255 skills, and 79 legacy command shims.
|
||||
- **Public surface synced to the live repo** — metadata, catalog counts, plugin manifests, and install-facing docs now match the actual OSS surface: 64 agents, 261 skills, and 84 legacy command shims.
|
||||
- **Operator and outbound workflow expansion** — `brand-voice`, `social-graph-ranker`, `connections-optimizer`, `customer-billing-ops`, `ecc-tools-cost-audit`, `google-workspace-ops`, `project-flow-ops`, and `workspace-surface-audit` round out the operator lane.
|
||||
- **Media and launch tooling** — `manim-video`, `remotion-video-creation`, and upgraded social publishing surfaces make technical explainers and launch content part of the same system.
|
||||
- **Framework and product surface growth** — `nestjs-patterns`, richer Codex/OpenCode install surfaces, and expanded cross-harness packaging keep the repo usable beyond Claude Code alone.
|
||||
@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ If you stacked methods, clean up in this order:
|
||||
/plugin list ecc@ecc
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**That's it!** You now have access to 64 agents, 255 skills, and 79 legacy command shims.
|
||||
**That's it!** You now have access to 64 agents, 261 skills, and 84 legacy command shims.
|
||||
|
||||
### Dashboard GUI
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1472,8 +1472,8 @@ The configuration is automatically detected from `.opencode/opencode.json`.
|
||||
| Feature | Claude Code | OpenCode | Status |
|
||||
|---------|---------------------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| Agents | PASS: 64 agents | PASS: 12 agents | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| Commands | PASS: 79 commands | PASS: 35 commands | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| Skills | PASS: 255 skills | PASS: 37 skills | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| Commands | PASS: 84 commands | PASS: 35 commands | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| Skills | PASS: 261 skills | PASS: 37 skills | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| Hooks | PASS: 8 event types | PASS: 11 events | **OpenCode has more!** |
|
||||
| Rules | PASS: 29 rules | PASS: 13 instructions | **Claude Code leads** |
|
||||
| MCP Servers | PASS: 14 servers | PASS: Full | **Full parity** |
|
||||
@ -1634,8 +1634,8 @@ ECC is the **first plugin to maximize every major AI coding tool**. Here's how e
|
||||
| Feature | Claude Code | Cursor IDE | Codex CLI | OpenCode | GitHub Copilot |
|
||||
|---------|-----------------------|------------|-----------|----------|----------------|
|
||||
| **Agents** | 64 | Shared (AGENTS.md) | Shared (AGENTS.md) | 12 | N/A |
|
||||
| **Commands** | 79 | Shared | Instruction-based | 35 | 6 prompts |
|
||||
| **Skills** | 255 | Shared | 10 (native format) | 37 | Via instructions |
|
||||
| **Commands** | 84 | Shared | Instruction-based | 35 | 6 prompts |
|
||||
| **Skills** | 261 | Shared | 10 (native format) | 37 | Via instructions |
|
||||
| **Hook Events** | 8 types | 15 types | None yet | 11 types | None |
|
||||
| **Hook Scripts** | 20+ scripts | 16 scripts (DRY adapter) | N/A | Plugin hooks | N/A |
|
||||
| **Rules** | 34 (common + lang) | 34 (YAML frontmatter) | Instruction-based | 13 instructions | 1 always-on file |
|
||||
|
||||
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Copy-Item -Recurse rules/typescript "$HOME/.claude/rules/"
|
||||
/plugin list ecc@ecc
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**完成!** 你现在可以使用 64 个代理、255 个技能和 79 个命令。
|
||||
**完成!** 你现在可以使用 64 个代理、261 个技能和 84 个命令。
|
||||
|
||||
### multi-* 命令需要额外配置
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -201,6 +201,11 @@ commands:
|
||||
- multi-frontend
|
||||
- multi-plan
|
||||
- multi-workflow
|
||||
- orch-add-feature
|
||||
- orch-build-mvp
|
||||
- orch-change-feature
|
||||
- orch-fix-defect
|
||||
- orch-refine-code
|
||||
- plan
|
||||
- plan-prd
|
||||
- pm2
|
||||
|
||||
36
commands/orch-add-feature.md
Normal file
36
commands/orch-add-feature.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Orchestrate building a brand-new feature end to end — research, plan, TDD, review, gated commit. Wrapper that kicks off the orch-add-feature skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /orch-add-feature
|
||||
|
||||
Manually launch the **orch-add-feature** orchestrator: a gated
|
||||
Research → Plan → TDD → Review → Commit pipeline for net-new capability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-add-feature <what to add>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-add-feature add OAuth2 login to nws-poller
|
||||
/orch-add-feature support CSV export in the dashboard
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `orch-add-feature` skill with `$ARGUMENTS` as the request. The skill
|
||||
(via the shared `orch-pipeline` engine) will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Classify size and state the tier in one line.
|
||||
2. Research existing libraries/patterns, then plan a `task_list`. → **GATE 1** (approve plan).
|
||||
3. TDD each task (new failing tests → green), then `code-reviewer`
|
||||
(+ `security-reviewer` if a security trigger is touched).
|
||||
4. Commit as conventional `feat:` commits. → **GATE 2** (confirm before commit).
|
||||
|
||||
Honor both gates — do not write implementation before Gate 1, do not commit before Gate 2.
|
||||
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user what capability to add.
|
||||
36
commands/orch-build-mvp.md
Normal file
36
commands/orch-build-mvp.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Orchestrate bootstrapping a working MVP from a design/spec doc — ingest, slice, scaffold, TDD, review, gated commit (reuses the GAN harness). Wrapper for the orch-build-mvp skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /orch-build-mvp
|
||||
|
||||
Manually launch the **orch-build-mvp** orchestrator: turn an SDD/PRD/system-design
|
||||
document into a running vertical slice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-build-mvp <path to design/spec doc>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-build-mvp civicpulse/docs/SDD-v0.6.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `orch-build-mvp` skill with `$ARGUMENTS` as the doc path. The skill
|
||||
(via the shared `orch-pipeline` engine, full pipeline incl. Scaffold) will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read the spec; extract scope, locked decisions, and a feature list ordered as
|
||||
**thin vertical slices** (one end-to-end path first). → **GATE 1** (approve slice plan).
|
||||
2. Scaffold the first end-to-end slice.
|
||||
3. Reuse the GAN harness: translate the SDD into `gan-harness/spec.md` +
|
||||
`eval-rubric.md`, then drive `/gan-build "<brief>" --skip-planner`
|
||||
(generator → evaluator loop) until the score passes or plateaus.
|
||||
4. `code-reviewer` (+ `security-reviewer` on any security-trigger slice), then
|
||||
commit the scaffold and each slice as separate `feat:` commits. → **GATE 2**.
|
||||
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user for the path to the design/spec doc.
|
||||
38
commands/orch-change-feature.md
Normal file
38
commands/orch-change-feature.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Orchestrate altering an existing, working feature to new desired behavior — update tests to the new spec, change impl, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-change-feature skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /orch-change-feature
|
||||
|
||||
Manually launch the **orch-change-feature** orchestrator: change behavior that
|
||||
already works to a new desired spec, tests-first.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-change-feature <the new desired behavior>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-change-feature make nws-poller alert at 2 warnings instead of 3
|
||||
/orch-change-feature instead of sorting by date, sort by priority
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `orch-change-feature` skill with `$ARGUMENTS` as the request. The skill
|
||||
(via the shared `orch-pipeline` engine) will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Classify size (default floor: small) and state the tier.
|
||||
2. Light plan only if the new behavior needs research. → **GATE 1** (approve changed-test plan).
|
||||
3. **Update the existing tests** to express the new behavior, then change the
|
||||
implementation until green. (Changing the tests first is what makes this a
|
||||
tweak, not a fix.)
|
||||
4. `code-reviewer` (+ `security-reviewer` on a security trigger), then commit. → **GATE 2**.
|
||||
|
||||
Use this only when the feature **works** but should behave differently — not for
|
||||
bugs (`/orch-fix-defect`) or net-new capability (`/orch-add-feature`).
|
||||
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user what behavior should change.
|
||||
38
commands/orch-fix-defect.md
Normal file
38
commands/orch-fix-defect.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Orchestrate fixing a bug — reproduce it as a failing regression test, fix to green, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-fix-defect skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /orch-fix-defect
|
||||
|
||||
Manually launch the **orch-fix-defect** orchestrator: prove the bug with a red
|
||||
test, then fix to green.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-fix-defect <what is broken>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-fix-defect poller crashes on empty NWS response
|
||||
/orch-fix-defect login returns 500 when email has a plus sign
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `orch-fix-defect` skill with `$ARGUMENTS` as the request. The skill
|
||||
(via the shared `orch-pipeline` engine) will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Classify size (default floor: small, often trivial); scope root cause with
|
||||
`code-explorer` if unclear.
|
||||
2. **Write a new failing regression test** reproducing the bug, then fix until
|
||||
it goes green. (Proving the bug first is what makes this a fix, not a tweak.)
|
||||
3. `code-reviewer` (+ `security-reviewer` if the defect sits in a sensitive path).
|
||||
4. Commit as a conventional `fix:` commit. → **GATE 2** (confirm before commit).
|
||||
|
||||
Use this only when behavior is **broken/wrong** — not for intentional changes
|
||||
(`/orch-change-feature`) or new capability (`/orch-add-feature`).
|
||||
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user to describe the defect.
|
||||
39
commands/orch-refine-code.md
Normal file
39
commands/orch-refine-code.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Orchestrate a behavior-preserving refactor — confirm tests green, restructure without changing behavior, keep green, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-refine-code skill.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /orch-refine-code
|
||||
|
||||
Manually launch the **orch-refine-code** orchestrator: improve structure while
|
||||
behavior stays identical, with the existing test suite as the safety net.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-refine-code <what to restructure>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/orch-refine-code extract the NWS HTTP client out of poller.py
|
||||
/orch-refine-code remove dead code and duplication in the dashboard module
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `orch-refine-code` skill with `$ARGUMENTS` as the request. The skill
|
||||
(via the shared `orch-pipeline` engine) will:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Classify size (default floor: standard — restructures touch multiple files).
|
||||
2. Confirm the relevant tests exist and are **green before** touching code; add
|
||||
characterization tests first if coverage is thin. Plan the restructure. → **GATE 1**.
|
||||
3. Restructure in small steps, re-running tests after each (no new behavior
|
||||
tests — the existing suite proves behavior is unchanged). Dead-code/dup sweeps
|
||||
delegate to `refactor-cleaner`.
|
||||
4. `code-reviewer`, then commit as `refactor:` (the diff must be behavior-neutral). → **GATE 2**.
|
||||
|
||||
Use this only when behavior must **not** change. If behavior should change at
|
||||
all, use `/orch-change-feature` or `/orch-fix-defect`.
|
||||
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, ask the user what to refine.
|
||||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
||||
"totalCommands": 79,
|
||||
"totalCommands": 84,
|
||||
"commands": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "aside",
|
||||
@ -490,6 +490,67 @@
|
||||
"skills": [],
|
||||
"path": "commands/multi-workflow.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "orch-add-feature",
|
||||
"description": "Orchestrate building a brand-new feature end to end — research, plan, TDD, review, gated commit. Wrapper that kicks off the orch-add-feature skill.",
|
||||
"type": "orchestration",
|
||||
"primaryAgents": [],
|
||||
"allAgents": [],
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"orch-add-feature"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"path": "commands/orch-add-feature.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "orch-build-mvp",
|
||||
"description": "Orchestrate bootstrapping a working MVP from a design/spec doc — ingest, slice, scaffold, TDD, review, gated commit (reuses the GAN harness). Wrapper for the orch-build-mvp skill.",
|
||||
"type": "orchestration",
|
||||
"primaryAgents": [],
|
||||
"allAgents": [],
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"orch-build-mvp"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"path": "commands/orch-build-mvp.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "orch-change-feature",
|
||||
"description": "Orchestrate altering an existing, working feature to new desired behavior — update tests to the new spec, change impl, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-change-feature skill.",
|
||||
"type": "orchestration",
|
||||
"primaryAgents": [],
|
||||
"allAgents": [],
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"orch-add-feature",
|
||||
"orch-change-feature",
|
||||
"orch-fix-defect"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"path": "commands/orch-change-feature.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "orch-fix-defect",
|
||||
"description": "Orchestrate fixing a bug — reproduce it as a failing regression test, fix to green, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-fix-defect skill.",
|
||||
"type": "orchestration",
|
||||
"primaryAgents": [],
|
||||
"allAgents": [],
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"orch-add-feature",
|
||||
"orch-change-feature",
|
||||
"orch-fix-defect"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"path": "commands/orch-fix-defect.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "orch-refine-code",
|
||||
"description": "Orchestrate a behavior-preserving refactor — confirm tests green, restructure without changing behavior, keep green, review, gated commit. Wrapper for the orch-refine-code skill.",
|
||||
"type": "orchestration",
|
||||
"primaryAgents": [],
|
||||
"allAgents": [],
|
||||
"skills": [
|
||||
"orch-change-feature",
|
||||
"orch-fix-defect",
|
||||
"orch-refine-code"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"path": "commands/orch-refine-code.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"command": "plan-prd",
|
||||
"description": "Generate a lean, problem-first PRD and hand off to /plan for implementation planning.",
|
||||
@ -864,7 +925,7 @@
|
||||
"byType": {
|
||||
"build": 2,
|
||||
"general": 7,
|
||||
"orchestration": 6,
|
||||
"orchestration": 11,
|
||||
"planning": 2,
|
||||
"refactoring": 1,
|
||||
"review": 9,
|
||||
@ -929,6 +990,18 @@
|
||||
"skill": "flutter-dart-code-review",
|
||||
"count": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "orch-add-feature",
|
||||
"count": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "orch-change-feature",
|
||||
"count": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "orch-fix-defect",
|
||||
"count": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "rust-patterns",
|
||||
"count": 3
|
||||
@ -940,18 +1013,6 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "cpp-testing",
|
||||
"count": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "ecc-guide",
|
||||
"count": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "golang-patterns",
|
||||
"count": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"skill": "golang-testing",
|
||||
"count": 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — 智能体指令
|
||||
|
||||
这是一个**生产就绪的 AI 编码插件**,提供 64 个专业代理、255 项技能、79 条命令以及自动化钩子工作流,用于软件开发。
|
||||
这是一个**生产就绪的 AI 编码插件**,提供 64 个专业代理、261 项技能、84 条命令以及自动化钩子工作流,用于软件开发。
|
||||
|
||||
**版本:** 2.0.0-rc.1
|
||||
|
||||
@ -147,8 +147,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
agents/ — 64 个专业子代理
|
||||
skills/ — 255 个工作流技能和领域知识
|
||||
commands/ — 79 个斜杠命令
|
||||
skills/ — 261 个工作流技能和领域知识
|
||||
commands/ — 84 个斜杠命令
|
||||
hooks/ — 基于触发的自动化
|
||||
rules/ — 始终遵循的指导方针(通用 + 每种语言)
|
||||
scripts/ — 跨平台 Node.js 实用工具
|
||||
|
||||
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ Copy-Item -Recurse rules/typescript "$HOME/.claude/rules/"
|
||||
/plugin list ecc@ecc
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**搞定!** 你现在可以使用 64 个智能体、255 项技能和 79 个命令了。
|
||||
**搞定!** 你现在可以使用 64 个智能体、261 项技能和 84 个命令了。
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1137,8 +1137,8 @@ opencode
|
||||
| 功能特性 | Claude Code | OpenCode | 状态 |
|
||||
|---------|---------------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| 智能体 | PASS: 64 个 | PASS: 12 个 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| 命令 | PASS: 79 个 | PASS: 35 个 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| 技能 | PASS: 255 项 | PASS: 37 项 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| 命令 | PASS: 84 个 | PASS: 35 个 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| 技能 | PASS: 261 项 | PASS: 37 项 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| 钩子 | PASS: 8 种事件类型 | PASS: 11 种事件 | **OpenCode 更多!** |
|
||||
| 规则 | PASS: 29 条 | PASS: 13 条指令 | **Claude Code 领先** |
|
||||
| MCP 服务器 | PASS: 14 个 | PASS: 完整 | **完全对等** |
|
||||
@ -1245,8 +1245,8 @@ ECC 是**第一个最大化利用每个主要 AI 编码工具的插件**。以
|
||||
| 功能特性 | Claude Code | Cursor IDE | Codex CLI | OpenCode |
|
||||
|---------|-----------------------|------------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| **智能体** | 64 | 共享 (AGENTS.md) | 共享 (AGENTS.md) | 12 |
|
||||
| **命令** | 79 | 共享 | 基于指令 | 35 |
|
||||
| **技能** | 255 | 共享 | 10 (原生格式) | 37 |
|
||||
| **命令** | 84 | 共享 | 基于指令 | 35 |
|
||||
| **技能** | 261 | 共享 | 10 (原生格式) | 37 |
|
||||
| **钩子事件** | 8 种类型 | 15 种类型 | 暂无 | 11 种类型 |
|
||||
| **钩子脚本** | 20+ 个脚本 | 16 个脚本 (DRY 适配器) | N/A | 插件钩子 |
|
||||
| **规则** | 34 (通用 + 语言) | 34 (YAML 前页) | 基于指令 | 13 条指令 |
|
||||
|
||||
44
skills/orch-add-feature/SKILL.md
Normal file
44
skills/orch-add-feature/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-add-feature
|
||||
description: Orchestrate building a brand-new feature end to end — research, plan, TDD implementation, review, and gated commit — by delegating each phase to the matching ECC agent. Use when adding a capability that does not exist yet.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# orch-add-feature
|
||||
|
||||
Actor · action · target: **orch · add · feature**. Thin wrapper over the shared
|
||||
engine in [`orch-pipeline`](../orch-pipeline/SKILL.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- The user wants a capability that does **not exist yet** ("add", "build",
|
||||
"implement", "support …").
|
||||
- It is net-new behavior — not a correction (`orch-fix-defect`) and not an
|
||||
alteration of existing behavior (`orch-change-feature`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Operation settings
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default size floor:** standard — run Research + Plan unless clearly small.
|
||||
- **Phase mask:** 0 → 1 → 2 → 4 → 5 → 6 (skip 3 Scaffold; that is MVP-only).
|
||||
- **First move (phase 4):** write *new* failing tests for the new behavior, then
|
||||
implement to green.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the `orch-pipeline` engine with the settings above.
|
||||
2. Classify size first; small / trivial features collapse toward 4 → 5 → 6.
|
||||
3. Stop at **Gate 1** (plan approval) and **Gate 2** (pre-commit).
|
||||
4. Add `security-reviewer` if the feature touches a security trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
> Related: `/feature-dev` is a standalone version of this flow. `orch-add-feature`
|
||||
> differs by sharing the `orch-pipeline` engine — the size classifier and the two
|
||||
> gates — with the rest of the family, so it right-sizes trivial features to 4 → 5 → 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
orch-add-feature: add OAuth2 login to nws-poller
|
||||
→ research existing auth libs → plan task_list [GATE 1: approve]
|
||||
→ TDD each task → code-review (+ security-reviewer: auth path)
|
||||
→ commit [GATE 2: confirm]
|
||||
```
|
||||
48
skills/orch-build-mvp/SKILL.md
Normal file
48
skills/orch-build-mvp/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-build-mvp
|
||||
description: Orchestrate bootstrapping a working MVP from a design or spec document — ingest the doc, plan thin vertical slices, scaffold the first end-to-end slice, then TDD-implement, review, and gated commit. Use to turn an SDD/PRD into a running starting point.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# orch-build-mvp
|
||||
|
||||
Actor · action · target: **orch · build · mvp**. Thin wrapper over the shared
|
||||
engine in [`orch-pipeline`](../orch-pipeline/SKILL.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- The user has a **design / spec document** (SDD, PRD, system_design) and wants a
|
||||
working vertical slice bootstrapped from it.
|
||||
- Takes a doc path as its argument, e.g. `civicpulse/docs/SDD-v0.6.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operation settings
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default size floor:** large — this is the full pipeline including Scaffold.
|
||||
- **Phase mask:** 0 (read the spec) → 1 → 2 (heavy) → 3 (scaffold) → 4 → 5 → 6.
|
||||
- **First move (phase 0 → 2):** read the doc; extract scope, locked decisions,
|
||||
and the feature list; order it into **thin vertical slices** (one end-to-end
|
||||
path first, not all-models-then-all-views). Phase 3 stands up that first slice.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the `orch-pipeline` engine with the settings above.
|
||||
2. **Reuse the existing GAN harness** instead of hand-rolling an iterate loop:
|
||||
- Translate the SDD into `gan-harness/spec.md` + `gan-harness/eval-rubric.md`
|
||||
(this stands in for what `gan-planner` would generate — you already have the spec).
|
||||
- Drive the build with `/gan-build "<one-line brief>" --skip-planner`
|
||||
(defaults: `--max-iterations 15`, `--pass-threshold 7.0`,
|
||||
`--eval-mode playwright`; use `--eval-mode code-only` for non-UI slices).
|
||||
- That command runs the `gan-generator` → `gan-evaluator` loop and writes
|
||||
`gan-harness/feedback/feedback-NNN.md` until the score passes or plateaus.
|
||||
3. Stop at **Gate 1** (slice plan) and **Gate 2** (pre-commit). Commit the
|
||||
scaffold and each slice as separate `feat:` commits.
|
||||
4. Add `security-reviewer` for any slice touching a security trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
orch-build-mvp: civicpulse/docs/SDD-v0.6.md
|
||||
→ read SDD → slice list (vertical) → scaffold slice 1 [GATE 1: approve]
|
||||
→ /gan-build --skip-planner (generator → evaluator loop) scores vs spec → review
|
||||
→ commit feat: [GATE 2: confirm] → next slice
|
||||
```
|
||||
42
skills/orch-change-feature/SKILL.md
Normal file
42
skills/orch-change-feature/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-change-feature
|
||||
description: Orchestrate altering an existing, working feature to new desired behavior — update its tests to the new spec, change the implementation to match, review, and gated commit. Use when behavior is not broken but should be different.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# orch-change-feature
|
||||
|
||||
Actor · action · target: **orch · change · feature**. Thin wrapper over the
|
||||
shared engine in [`orch-pipeline`](../orch-pipeline/SKILL.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- An existing feature **works**, but the desired behavior is different ("change",
|
||||
"adjust", "make it also …", "instead of X do Y").
|
||||
- Distinguish from siblings:
|
||||
- **not** broken → not `orch-fix-defect` (no bug to reproduce).
|
||||
- **not** new → not `orch-add-feature` (the capability already exists).
|
||||
|
||||
## Operation settings
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default size floor:** small — most tweaks are a function or two.
|
||||
- **Phase mask:** 0 → (1 only if the new behavior needs research) → light 2 →
|
||||
4 → 5 → 6.
|
||||
- **First move (phase 4):** update the *existing* tests to express the new
|
||||
desired behavior, then change the implementation until they pass. Changing the
|
||||
tests first is what separates a tweak from a fix.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the `orch-pipeline` engine with the settings above.
|
||||
2. Keep the plan light — only `standard`+ size warrants the full `planner` pass.
|
||||
3. Stop at **Gate 1** (plan / changed-test approval) and **Gate 2** (pre-commit).
|
||||
4. Add `security-reviewer` if the change touches a security trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
orch-change-feature: make nws-poller alert at 2 warnings instead of 3
|
||||
→ update threshold tests to new spec → change impl to green
|
||||
→ code-review → commit [GATE 2: confirm]
|
||||
```
|
||||
42
skills/orch-fix-defect/SKILL.md
Normal file
42
skills/orch-fix-defect/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-fix-defect
|
||||
description: Orchestrate fixing a bug — reproduce it as a failing regression test, fix to green, review, and gated commit — by delegating each phase to the matching ECC agent. Use when existing behavior is broken or wrong.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# orch-fix-defect
|
||||
|
||||
Actor · action · target: **orch · fix · defect**. Thin wrapper over the shared
|
||||
engine in [`orch-pipeline`](../orch-pipeline/SKILL.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- Something is **broken**: wrong output, an error, a crash, a regression.
|
||||
- Distinguish from siblings:
|
||||
- behavior is correct but you want it different → `orch-change-feature`.
|
||||
- the capability does not exist yet → `orch-add-feature`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operation settings
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default size floor:** small (often trivial).
|
||||
- **Phase mask:** 0 → (light 2 only if root cause is non-obvious or standard+) →
|
||||
4 → 5 → 6. Research (1) is usually skipped.
|
||||
- **First move (phase 4):** reproduce the bug as a **new failing** test
|
||||
(regression test), then fix until it goes green. Proving the bug exists first
|
||||
is what separates a fix from a tweak.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the `orch-pipeline` engine with the settings above.
|
||||
2. If the root cause is unclear, scope it with `code-explorer` before the red
|
||||
test; escalate build breaks to `build-error-resolver` / `/build-fix`.
|
||||
3. Stop at **Gate 1** (only if a plan was produced) and **Gate 2** (pre-commit).
|
||||
4. Add `security-reviewer` if the defect sits in a security-sensitive path.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
orch-fix-defect: poller crashes on empty NWS response
|
||||
→ write failing test reproducing the crash → fix to green
|
||||
→ code-review → commit [GATE 2: confirm] (commit: fix:)
|
||||
```
|
||||
120
skills/orch-pipeline/SKILL.md
Normal file
120
skills/orch-pipeline/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-pipeline
|
||||
description: Shared orchestration engine for the orch-* skill family. Defines the gated Research-Plan-TDD-Review-Commit pipeline, the size classifier, the agent map, and the two human gates that the orch-* operation skills delegate to. Not usually invoked directly.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Orchestrator Pipeline (shared engine)
|
||||
|
||||
The `orch-*` skills are thin wrappers. They do not re-implement any work — they
|
||||
classify the request, choose which phases of *this* pipeline run, and delegate
|
||||
each phase to an existing ECC agent or command. This file is that pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
> Invoke an operation skill (`orch-add-feature`, `orch-fix-defect`, …) rather
|
||||
> than this engine directly. This file is the reference they point at.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- Loaded indirectly whenever an `orch-*` operation skill runs.
|
||||
- Read directly only when adding a new operation to the family or tuning the
|
||||
shared phases, gates, or agent map.
|
||||
|
||||
## The operation family
|
||||
|
||||
| Skill | Operation | Trigger | First move |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| `orch-add-feature` | feature | capability does not exist yet | research + plan a new slice |
|
||||
| `orch-change-feature` | tweak | works, but desired behavior differs | amend existing behavior *and its tests* |
|
||||
| `orch-fix-defect` | fix | broken; behavior is wrong | reproduce as a failing test, then fix |
|
||||
| `orch-refine-code` | refactor | behavior stays, structure improves | restructure while keeping tests green |
|
||||
| `orch-build-mvp` | mvp | bootstrap from a design/spec doc | ingest doc → vertical slices |
|
||||
|
||||
> These wrappers **compose** existing ECC commands rather than replace them:
|
||||
> `/feature-dev`, `/plan`, `/code-review`, `/build-fix`, `/refactor-clean`, and
|
||||
> `/gan-build`, plus the `tdd-workflow` skill. The orch-* family adds the shared
|
||||
> size classifier and the two gates
|
||||
> on top of them, so one umbrella covers all five operations consistently.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 0 — Classify size (right-sizing)
|
||||
|
||||
Ceremony scales to blast radius. Score the request on three signals, take the
|
||||
**highest** tier any signal reaches, and state the result in one line so the user
|
||||
can override:
|
||||
|
||||
| Tier | Files touched | New dependency / contract | Design ambiguity | Phases that run |
|
||||
|------|---------------|---------------------------|------------------|-----------------|
|
||||
| trivial | 1, a few lines | none | none — the change is obvious | 4 → 5 → 6 |
|
||||
| small | 1 file / 1 function | none | clear once you read the code | (1 light) → 4 → 5 → 6 |
|
||||
| standard | 2–5 files | maybe a new internal module | one real choice to make | 1 → 2 → 4 → 5 → 6 |
|
||||
| large | many / cross-cutting | new external dep, public API, or a spec doc | multiple open questions | 1 → 2 → (3) → 4 → 5 → 6 |
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 0 (Intake) always runs and is omitted from the mask column above. The
|
||||
tie-breaker: anything touching a security trigger (below) or a public API /
|
||||
contract is **at least** standard, regardless of file count.
|
||||
|
||||
## The phases
|
||||
|
||||
Each phase delegates — it does not do the work inline.
|
||||
|
||||
- **0. Intake** — restate the request. For `orch-build-mvp`, read the spec/design
|
||||
doc and extract scope, locked decisions, and a feature list.
|
||||
- **1. Research & Reuse** — per `rules/common/development-workflow.md`: `gh search repos` /
|
||||
`gh search code`, then Context7 / vendor docs, then package registries, then
|
||||
Exa. Prefer adopting a proven implementation over net-new code.
|
||||
- **2. Plan** — delegate to the `planner` agent (or `architect` /
|
||||
`code-architect` for structural decisions). Output a `task_list` ordered as
|
||||
thin vertical slices. → **GATE 1.**
|
||||
- **3. Scaffold** — `orch-build-mvp` only: stand up the first end-to-end slice.
|
||||
- **4. Implement (TDD)** — drive each task through the `tdd-guide` agent (or the `tdd-workflow` skill):
|
||||
red → green → refactor. Honor the operation's first-move rule.
|
||||
- **5. Review** — `code-reviewer` agent / `/code-review`. Add `security-reviewer`
|
||||
whenever the diff touches a security trigger (below).
|
||||
- **6. Commit** — conventional commits (`feat:` / `fix:` / `refactor:` / …), one
|
||||
per logical chunk. → **GATE 2.**
|
||||
|
||||
## The two gates
|
||||
|
||||
This family is **gated, not autonomous**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **GATE 1 — after Plan.** Present the `task_list`; do not write implementation
|
||||
code until the user approves.
|
||||
2. **GATE 2 — before Commit.** Present the diff summary and proposed messages;
|
||||
do not commit until the user confirms.
|
||||
|
||||
Everything between the gates flows without stopping.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent / command map
|
||||
|
||||
| Phase | Primary | Fallback / escalation |
|
||||
|-------|---------|----------------------|
|
||||
| Intake / understand | `code-explorer` | trace existing paths before a tweak, fix, or refactor |
|
||||
| Plan | `planner` | `architect`, `code-architect` for structural calls |
|
||||
| Implement | `tdd-guide` (or `tdd-workflow` skill) | `build-error-resolver` / `/build-fix` on build breaks |
|
||||
| Review | `code-reviewer` / `/code-review` | language reviewer (`python-reviewer`, `typescript-reviewer`, …) |
|
||||
| Security | `security-reviewer` | — |
|
||||
| MVP inner loop | `/gan-build "<brief>" --skip-planner` | drives `gan-generator` → `gan-evaluator`; tune `--max-iterations` / `--pass-threshold` |
|
||||
|
||||
Match the language reviewer to the repo (see the repo's own `CLAUDE.md`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Security-review trigger
|
||||
|
||||
Pull in `security-reviewer` when the diff touches any of: authentication or
|
||||
authorization, user-input handling, database queries, file-system paths,
|
||||
external API calls, cryptography, or secrets / credentials. (Per `rules/common/security.md`.)
|
||||
|
||||
## Handoff artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
The pipeline carries no hidden state — the planning docs *are* the handoff:
|
||||
|
||||
- `task_list` (from Plan) drives the Implement loop.
|
||||
- Larger work may also emit PRD / architecture / system_design under the repo's
|
||||
`docs/` per `rules/common/development-workflow.md`.
|
||||
- Review findings (CRITICAL / HIGH) must be resolved before Gate 2.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- size tier was stated and matched the work
|
||||
- Gate 1 (plan) and Gate 2 (commit) were both honored
|
||||
- `security-reviewer` ran iff a security trigger was touched
|
||||
- commits are conventional and scoped to one logical change
|
||||
- new / changed behavior has tests; coverage ≥ 80% per `rules/common/testing.md`
|
||||
43
skills/orch-refine-code/SKILL.md
Normal file
43
skills/orch-refine-code/SKILL.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orch-refine-code
|
||||
description: Orchestrate a behavior-preserving refactor — confirm tests are green, restructure without changing behavior, keep tests green, review, and gated commit. Use when the structure should improve but behavior must not change.
|
||||
origin: ECC
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# orch-refine-code
|
||||
|
||||
Actor · action · target: **orch · refine · code**. Thin wrapper over the shared
|
||||
engine in [`orch-pipeline`](../orch-pipeline/SKILL.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- Same behavior, **better structure**: extract modules, remove duplication, kill
|
||||
dead code, reduce nesting, rename for clarity.
|
||||
- Distinguish from siblings: if behavior is meant to change at all, this is the
|
||||
wrong skill (`orch-change-feature` / `orch-fix-defect`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Operation settings
|
||||
|
||||
- **Default size floor:** standard — restructures touch multiple files.
|
||||
- **Phase mask:** 0 → 2 (plan the restructure) → 4 (keep green) → 5 → 6. No new
|
||||
behavior tests are written — the existing suite is the safety net.
|
||||
- **First move (phase 4):** confirm the relevant tests exist and are **green
|
||||
before** touching code; if coverage is thin, add characterization tests first.
|
||||
Then restructure in small steps, re-running tests after each.
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the `orch-pipeline` engine with the settings above.
|
||||
2. For dead-code / duplication sweeps, delegate to the `refactor-cleaner` agent
|
||||
(it runs knip / depcheck / ts-prune and removes safely).
|
||||
3. Stop at **Gate 1** (restructure plan) and **Gate 2** (pre-commit).
|
||||
4. Commit as `refactor:` — the diff must be behavior-neutral.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
orch-refine-code: extract the NWS HTTP client out of poller.py
|
||||
→ confirm tests green → plan extraction [GATE 1: approve]
|
||||
→ move in small steps, tests green throughout → code-review
|
||||
→ commit refactor: [GATE 2: confirm]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user