diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md index 6e8769d7..9006a079 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- personality, voice, narrative, and founder-brand tension across 8 modules using laddering, 5 Whys, and projective techniques. Produces a resumable session with disk-persisted state and a master brandbook (90_SYNTHESIS.md). -origin: community --- # Brand Discovery diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md index 8788b945..d5ccf175 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ ### Candidate Why formulations (offer 2–3 versions, vary register and specificity) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Open questions / threads to pursue in later modules diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md index fe32d241..7e489433 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ ### Alternative framings (vary the category or the differentiator) -1. -2. +1. +2. ### White-space hypothesis (what no competitor is claiming that this brand could own) diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md index d58a4c39..92009884 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ ### Personality in action (3 behavioural guidelines derived from the archetype) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### What the brand must never sound or look like (the anti-personality) diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md index edc17436..9239f55a 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Module 50 — Voice & Tone -> **Frameworks:** Brand voice spectrum (formal ↔ casual, serious ↔ playful, -> distant ↔ warm, conventional ↔ irreverent) · Content-type tone matrix +> **Frameworks:** Brand voice spectrum (formal <-> casual, serious <-> playful, +> distant <-> warm, conventional <-> irreverent) · Content-type tone matrix > > **Goal:** Codify the brand's verbal register precisely enough that two different > writers produce copy that sounds like the same person. Voice is constant; @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ ### The three things to check every draft against -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Open questions / tensions with Module 40 Personality diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md index 11a8376c..b3985a04 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md @@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ ### Trueline draft (Neumeier: "[Brand] is the only [category] that [unique claim].") -> +> ### Alternative truelines (2–3 variations, vary level of abstraction) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Brand story arc diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md index 5c414e27..0675e37a 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ [Founder IS the brand] ←————————→ [Organisation brand stands alone] 1 2 3 4 5 ``` -Current position: ___ Target position (3-year): ___ +Current position: `___` Target position (3-year): `___` ### What the founder brand should own (and keeps owning) diff --git a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md index c1a5d635..095396a6 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md +++ b/.agents/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ ### 1. The Why (from Module 10) > **Core belief:** - +> > **Behavioural How (values in action):** - +> > **What we refuse to be:** --- @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > For **[target client]** who **[situation]**, **[brand name]** is the > **[category]** that **[unique value]**. Unlike **[alternatives]**, we > **[key differentiator]**. - +> > **White-space the brand owns:** --- @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ ### 3. Audience (from Module 30) > **Ideal Client Profile (one-paragraph portrait):** - +> > **Niche the brand is building toward:** - +> > **Red-flag / disqualifier:** --- @@ -68,17 +68,17 @@ ### 4b. Aaker Brand System (from Module 40) > **Primary archetype** (Mark & Pearson): - +> > **Secondary archetype** (if present): - +> > **Aaker brand identity** — four dimensions: > - *Brand as product:* > - *Brand as organisation:* > - *Brand as person (personality):* > - *Brand as symbol:* - +> > **Brand associations** (3–5 key associations the brand should own): - +> > **Brand equity signals** (what clients would lose if this brand disappeared): --- @@ -86,18 +86,18 @@ ### 5. Voice & Tone summary (from Module 50) > **Voice statement (one paragraph):** - +> > **The three checks every draft must pass:** -> 1. -> 2. -> 3. +> 1. +> 2. +> 3. --- ### 6. Narrative assets (from Module 60) > **Trueline:** - +> > **Brand story arc (one paragraph, usable as an About page starting point):** --- @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ ### 7. Founder / organisation brand boundary (from Module 70) > **What the founder brand owns:** - +> > **What the organisation brand owns:** --- @@ -128,6 +128,6 @@ -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. diff --git a/.agents/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md b/.agents/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md index da1078be..dc9eee96 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md +++ b/.agents/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- counts as a competitor, which tier they belong to, and which sources to mine. First step in the three-skill competitive pipeline; precedes benchmark-methodology. -origin: community --- # Competitive Platform Analysis diff --git a/.agents/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md b/.agents/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md index 7336b63b..e5e9b1ce 100644 --- a/.agents/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md +++ b/.agents/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- profiles, benchmarking matrix, white-space analysis, strategic recommendations, and team alignment trigger questions. Final step in the three-skill competitive pipeline. -origin: community --- # Competitive Report Structure @@ -59,7 +58,7 @@ this and knows what to do. No methodology here. ### 2. Market landscape & category framing Define the category and map it. Use a **multi-axis map** — at minimum a 2×2 -(e.g., *brand-led ↔ capability-led* × *boutique ↔ enterprise-scale*), and +(e.g., *brand-led <-> capability-led* × *boutique <-> enterprise-scale*), and ideally the **client's tension plot** from `benchmark-methodology` as the headline map. Place every profiled competitor and the client. The map should make the client's intended position visually obvious and show how crowded (or diff --git a/.claude-plugin/plugin.json b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json index 1ad28ba7..0d33e14f 100644 --- a/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +++ b/.claude-plugin/plugin.json @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ { "name": "ecc", "version": "2.0.0", - "description": "Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 64 agents, 262 skills, 84 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses", + "description": "Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 64 agents, 269 skills, 84 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses", "author": { "name": "Affaan Mustafa", "url": "https://x.com/affaanmustafa" diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index 7fdbb6e8..928835ef 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions -This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 64 specialized agents, 262 skills, 84 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development. +This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 64 specialized agents, 269 skills, 84 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development. **Version:** 2.0.0 @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementat ``` agents/ — 64 specialized subagents -skills/ — 262 workflow skills and domain knowledge +skills/ — 269 workflow skills and domain knowledge commands/ — 84 slash commands hooks/ — Trigger-based automations rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 6c3bf5a9..2acf7877 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ Stable graduation of the 2.0 line: 265 skills, the control-pane substrate (sessi ### v2.0.0-rc.1 — Surface Refresh, Operator Workflows, and ECC 2.0 Alpha (Apr 2026) - **Dashboard GUI** — New Tkinter-based desktop application (`ecc_dashboard.py` or `npm run dashboard`) with dark/light theme toggle, font customization, and project logo in header and taskbar. -- **Public surface synced to the live repo** — metadata, catalog counts, plugin manifests, and install-facing docs now match the actual OSS surface: 64 agents, 261 skills, and 84 legacy command shims. +- **Public surface synced to the live repo** — metadata, catalog counts, plugin manifests, and install-facing docs now match the actual OSS surface: 64 agents, 265 skills, and 84 legacy command shims. - **Operator and outbound workflow expansion** — `brand-voice`, `social-graph-ranker`, `connections-optimizer`, `customer-billing-ops`, `ecc-tools-cost-audit`, `google-workspace-ops`, `project-flow-ops`, and `workspace-surface-audit` round out the operator lane. - **Media and launch tooling** — `manim-video`, `remotion-video-creation`, and upgraded social publishing surfaces make technical explainers and launch content part of the same system. - **Framework and product surface growth** — `nestjs-patterns`, richer Codex/OpenCode install surfaces, and expanded cross-harness packaging keep the repo usable beyond Claude Code alone. diff --git a/docs/zh-CN/AGENTS.md b/docs/zh-CN/AGENTS.md index 35324690..c89e642a 100644 --- a/docs/zh-CN/AGENTS.md +++ b/docs/zh-CN/AGENTS.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Everything Claude Code (ECC) — 智能体指令 -这是一个**生产就绪的 AI 编码插件**，提供 64 个专业代理、262 项技能、84 条命令以及自动化钩子工作流，用于软件开发。 +这是一个**生产就绪的 AI 编码插件**，提供 64 个专业代理、269 项技能、84 条命令以及自动化钩子工作流，用于软件开发。 **版本:** 2.0.0 @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ ``` agents/ — 64 个专业子代理 -skills/ — 262 个工作流技能和领域知识 +skills/ — 269 个工作流技能和领域知识 commands/ — 84 个斜杠命令 hooks/ — 基于触发的自动化 rules/ — 始终遵循的指导方针（通用 + 每种语言） diff --git a/package-lock.json b/package-lock.json index 423f95fd..b30aae3c 100644 --- a/package-lock.json +++ b/package-lock.json @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ "integrity": "sha512-NZyJarBfL7nWwIq+FDL6Zp/yHEhePMNnnJ0y3qfieCrmNvYct8uvtiV41UvlSe6apAfk0fY1FbWx+NwfmpvtTg==", "dev": true, "license": "MIT", + "peer": true, "bin": { "acorn": "bin/acorn" }, @@ -852,6 +853,7 @@ "integrity": "sha512-LEyamqS7W5HB3ujJyvi0HQK/dtVINZvd5mAAp9eT5S/ujByGjiZLCzPcHVzuXbpJDJF/cxwHlfceVUDZ2lnSTw==", "dev": true, "license": "MIT", + "peer": true, "dependencies": { "@eslint-community/eslint-utils": "^4.8.0", "@eslint-community/regexpp": "^4.12.1", @@ -2433,6 +2435,7 @@ "integrity": "sha512-QP88BAKvMam/3NxH6vj2o21R6MjxZUAd6nlwAS/pnGvN9IVLocLHxGYIzFhg6fUQ+5th6P4dv4eW9jX3DSIj7A==", "dev": true, "license": "MIT", + "peer": true, "engines": { "node": ">=12" }, diff --git a/skills/benchmark-methodology/SKILL.md b/skills/benchmark-methodology/SKILL.md index 950784c3..bc75367f 100644 --- a/skills/benchmark-methodology/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/benchmark-methodology/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- visual craft, offer packaging, evidence, enterprise-readiness, thought leadership, pricing, client's strategic tension) with explicit 1–5 rubrics and a tension-plot. Precedes competitive-report-structure. -origin: community --- # Benchmark Methodology diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md b/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md index 6e8769d7..9006a079 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- personality, voice, narrative, and founder-brand tension across 8 modules using laddering, 5 Whys, and projective techniques. Produces a resumable session with disk-persisted state and a master brandbook (90_SYNTHESIS.md). -origin: community --- # Brand Discovery diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md index 8788b945..d5ccf175 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/10_purpose-why.md @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ ### Candidate Why formulations (offer 2–3 versions, vary register and specificity) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Open questions / threads to pursue in later modules diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md index fe32d241..7e489433 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/20_positioning.md @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ ### Alternative framings (vary the category or the differentiator) -1. -2. +1. +2. ### White-space hypothesis (what no competitor is claiming that this brand could own) diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md index d58a4c39..92009884 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/40_personality-archetype.md @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ ### Personality in action (3 behavioural guidelines derived from the archetype) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### What the brand must never sound or look like (the anti-personality) diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md index edc17436..9239f55a 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/50_voice-tone.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Module 50 — Voice & Tone -> **Frameworks:** Brand voice spectrum (formal ↔ casual, serious ↔ playful, -> distant ↔ warm, conventional ↔ irreverent) · Content-type tone matrix +> **Frameworks:** Brand voice spectrum (formal <-> casual, serious <-> playful, +> distant <-> warm, conventional <-> irreverent) · Content-type tone matrix > > **Goal:** Codify the brand's verbal register precisely enough that two different > writers produce copy that sounds like the same person. Voice is constant; @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ ### The three things to check every draft against -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Open questions / tensions with Module 40 Personality diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md index 11a8376c..b3985a04 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/60_narrative-story.md @@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ ### Trueline draft (Neumeier: "[Brand] is the only [category] that [unique claim].") -> +> ### Alternative truelines (2–3 variations, vary level of abstraction) -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. ### Brand story arc diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md index 5c414e27..0675e37a 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/70_founder-tension.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ [Founder IS the brand] ←————————→ [Organisation brand stands alone] 1 2 3 4 5 ``` -Current position: ___ Target position (3-year): ___ +Current position: `___` Target position (3-year): `___` ### What the founder brand should own (and keeps owning) diff --git a/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md b/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md index c1a5d635..095396a6 100644 --- a/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md +++ b/skills/brand-discovery/references/90_SYNTHESIS.md @@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ ### 1. The Why (from Module 10) > **Core belief:** - +> > **Behavioural How (values in action):** - +> > **What we refuse to be:** --- @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > For **[target client]** who **[situation]**, **[brand name]** is the > **[category]** that **[unique value]**. Unlike **[alternatives]**, we > **[key differentiator]**. - +> > **White-space the brand owns:** --- @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ ### 3. Audience (from Module 30) > **Ideal Client Profile (one-paragraph portrait):** - +> > **Niche the brand is building toward:** - +> > **Red-flag / disqualifier:** --- @@ -68,17 +68,17 @@ ### 4b. Aaker Brand System (from Module 40) > **Primary archetype** (Mark & Pearson): - +> > **Secondary archetype** (if present): - +> > **Aaker brand identity** — four dimensions: > - *Brand as product:* > - *Brand as organisation:* > - *Brand as person (personality):* > - *Brand as symbol:* - +> > **Brand associations** (3–5 key associations the brand should own): - +> > **Brand equity signals** (what clients would lose if this brand disappeared): --- @@ -86,18 +86,18 @@ ### 5. Voice & Tone summary (from Module 50) > **Voice statement (one paragraph):** - +> > **The three checks every draft must pass:** -> 1. -> 2. -> 3. +> 1. +> 2. +> 3. --- ### 6. Narrative assets (from Module 60) > **Trueline:** - +> > **Brand story arc (one paragraph, usable as an About page starting point):** --- @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ ### 7. Founder / organisation brand boundary (from Module 70) > **What the founder brand owns:** - +> > **What the organisation brand owns:** --- @@ -128,6 +128,6 @@ -1. -2. -3. +1. +2. +3. diff --git a/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md b/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md index da1078be..dc9eee96 100644 --- a/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/competitive-platform-analysis/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- counts as a competitor, which tier they belong to, and which sources to mine. First step in the three-skill competitive pipeline; precedes benchmark-methodology. -origin: community --- # Competitive Platform Analysis diff --git a/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md b/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md index 7336b63b..e5e9b1ce 100644 --- a/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/competitive-report-structure/SKILL.md @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >- profiles, benchmarking matrix, white-space analysis, strategic recommendations, and team alignment trigger questions. Final step in the three-skill competitive pipeline. -origin: community --- # Competitive Report Structure @@ -59,7 +58,7 @@ this and knows what to do. No methodology here. ### 2. Market landscape & category framing Define the category and map it. Use a **multi-axis map** — at minimum a 2×2 -(e.g., *brand-led ↔ capability-led* × *boutique ↔ enterprise-scale*), and +(e.g., *brand-led <-> capability-led* × *boutique <-> enterprise-scale*), and ideally the **client's tension plot** from `benchmark-methodology` as the headline map. Place every profiled competitor and the client. The map should make the client's intended position visually obvious and show how crowded (or