* feat(skills): make tdd-workflow test-runner aware (npm/pnpm/yarn/bun)
Add "Step 0: Detect the Test Runner" so the RED/GREEN cycle no longer
hardcodes `npm test`. Distinguishes the package manager from the test
runner (a project can install with Bun yet run Jest/Vitest), adds a runner
command matrix, and warns about `bun test` (native bun:test runner) vs
`bun run test` (runs the package.json script) — a common ESM failure mode.
Adds a Bun native test pattern section and links the bun-runtime skill.
Applied to both the canonical skills/ copy and the .agents/skills/ Codex
subset (manual sync per CONTRIBUTING).
* docs(skills): apply <test>/<coverage> placeholders in tdd-workflow steps
Address review feedback on PR #2347: Step 0 instructs the agent to substitute
the detected runner command, but Steps 3/5/7, Run Coverage Report, Watch Mode,
Pre-Commit, and CI/CD still showed literal `npm test` / `npm run test:coverage`
— so an agent reaching those blocks could run npm test on a pnpm/bun project.
Replace them with the <test> / <test-watch> / <coverage> placeholders from
Step 0. Left untouched: the plan-handoff allowlist example and the Step 8
evidence-table samples (illustrative, not run-this instructions). Applied to
both the canonical and Codex-subset copies.
* docs(skills): make pre-commit lint runner-agnostic via <lint> placeholder
Follow-up to PR #2347 review (CodeRabbit): the pre-commit example still used
`npm run lint`, coupling it to npm after test/coverage were made runner-aware.
Add a `<lint>` column to the Step 0 runner matrix (npm run lint / pnpm lint /
yarn lint / bun run lint) and change the Pre-Commit Hook example to
`<test> && <lint>`. Applied to both the canonical and Codex-subset copies.
* chore: re-trigger CI (flaky windows/node20 npm cell)
* docs(skills): document tdd plan handoff evidence
Address issue #2138 by clarifying how tdd-workflow should continue from a plan file, preserve human-readable test guarantees, and retain RED/GREEN evidence across squash merges.
* docs(skills): harden tdd plan handoff guidance
Address review feedback on #2235: use angle-bracket argument hint, treat plan files as untrusted input, and prefer project-local documentation paths for TDD evidence reports.
* docs(skills): clarify plan handoff injection guard
Address review feedback by explicitly stating that plan file content is data, not AI instructions, and that validation commands from untrusted plans require sanitization and approval before execution.
* Update skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* docs(skills): address tdd workflow review nits
Clarify plan handoff safety decisions, remove redundant untrusted-input wording, and show consistent TDD evidence path examples.
---------
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Add origin field to all skill files to track their source repository.
This enables users to identify where distributed skills originated from.
Fixesaffaan-m/everything-claude-code#246
