BERORINPO db7f2a6fd5 fix(skills): move top-level origin frontmatter key under metadata
The official Agent Skills spec (agentskills.io/specification) whitelists exactly
6 top-level frontmatter keys (name/description/license/compatibility/metadata/
allowed-tools). A top-level `origin` key fails the official validator
(anthropics/skills quick_validate.py ALLOWED_PROPERTIES; skills-ref validate).

This moves `origin: X` -> `metadata.origin: X` across the canonical skills/
tree, preserving each value verbatim. Frontmatter-only, minimal diff.

- 251 SKILL.md updated (242 new metadata block, 9 appended to existing metadata)
- origin values preserved verbatim (verified 251/251)
- YAML validated on all changed files
- scoped to canonical skills/ only (docs/<lang> translations + tool mirrors
  .cursor/.kiro/.agents left untouched; presumably regenerated from canonical)

Addresses #2233
2026-06-11 21:12:21 +09:00

2.3 KiB

name, description, metadata, version
name description metadata version
dashboard-builder Build monitoring dashboards that answer real operator questions for Grafana, SigNoz, and similar platforms. Use when turning metrics into a working dashboard instead of a vanity board.
origin
ECC direct-port adaptation
1.0.0

Dashboard Builder

Use this when the task is to build a dashboard people can operate from.

The goal is not "show every metric." The goal is to answer:

  • is it healthy?
  • where is the bottleneck?
  • what changed?
  • what action should someone take?

When to Use

  • "Build a Kafka monitoring dashboard"
  • "Create a Grafana dashboard for Elasticsearch"
  • "Make a SigNoz dashboard for this service"
  • "Turn this metrics list into a real operational dashboard"

Guardrails

  • do not start from visual layout; start from operator questions
  • do not include every available metric just because it exists
  • do not mix health, throughput, and resource panels without structure
  • do not ship panels without titles, units, and sane thresholds

Workflow

1. Define the operating questions

Organize around:

  • health / availability
  • latency / performance
  • throughput / volume
  • saturation / resources
  • service-specific risk

2. Study the target platform schema

Inspect existing dashboards first:

  • JSON structure
  • query language
  • variables
  • threshold styling
  • section layout

3. Build the minimum useful board

Recommended structure:

  1. overview
  2. performance
  3. resources
  4. service-specific section

4. Cut vanity panels

Every panel should answer a real question. If it does not, remove it.

Example Panel Sets

Elasticsearch

  • cluster health
  • shard allocation
  • search latency
  • indexing rate
  • JVM heap / GC

Kafka

  • broker count
  • under-replicated partitions
  • messages in / out
  • consumer lag
  • disk and network pressure

API gateway / ingress

  • request rate
  • p50 / p95 / p99 latency
  • error rate
  • upstream health
  • active connections

Quality Checklist

  • valid dashboard JSON
  • clear section grouping
  • titles and units are present
  • thresholds/status colors are meaningful
  • variables exist for common filters
  • default time range and refresh are sensible
  • no vanity panels with no operator value
  • research-ops
  • backend-patterns
  • terminal-ops