mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-06-18 18:40:16 +08:00
The official Agent Skills spec (agentskills.io/specification) whitelists exactly 6 top-level frontmatter keys (name/description/license/compatibility/metadata/ allowed-tools). A top-level `origin` key fails the official validator (anthropics/skills quick_validate.py ALLOWED_PROPERTIES; skills-ref validate). This moves `origin: X` -> `metadata.origin: X` across the canonical skills/ tree, preserving each value verbatim. Frontmatter-only, minimal diff. - 251 SKILL.md updated (242 new metadata block, 9 appended to existing metadata) - origin values preserved verbatim (verified 251/251) - YAML validated on all changed files - scoped to canonical skills/ only (docs/<lang> translations + tool mirrors .cursor/.kiro/.agents left untouched; presumably regenerated from canonical) Addresses #2233
2.9 KiB
2.9 KiB
name, description, metadata
| name | description | metadata | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| terminal-ops | Evidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified. |
|
Terminal Ops
Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.
This skill is intentionally narrower than general coding guidance. It is an operator workflow for evidence-first terminal execution.
Skill Stack
Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
verification-loopfor exact proving steps after changestdd-workflowwhen the right fix needs regression coveragesecurity-reviewwhen secrets, auth, or external inputs are involvedgithub-opswhen the task depends on CI runs, PR state, or release statusknowledge-opswhen the verified outcome needs to be captured into durable project context
When to Use
- user says "fix", "debug", "run this", "check the repo", or "push it"
- the task depends on command output, git state, test results, or a verified local fix
- the answer must distinguish changed locally, verified locally, committed, and pushed
Guardrails
- inspect before editing
- stay read-only if the user asked for audit/review only
- prefer repo-local scripts and helpers over improvised ad hoc wrappers
- do not claim fixed until the proving command was rerun
- do not claim pushed unless the branch actually moved upstream
Workflow
1. Resolve the working surface
Settle:
- exact repo path
- branch
- local diff state
- requested mode:
- inspect
- fix
- verify
- push
2. Read the failing surface first
Before changing anything:
- inspect the error
- inspect the file or test
- inspect git state
- use any already-supplied logs or context before re-reading blindly
3. Keep the fix narrow
Solve one dominant failure at a time:
- use the smallest useful proving command first
- only escalate to a bigger build/test pass after the local failure is addressed
- if a command keeps failing with the same signature, stop broad retries and narrow scope
4. Report exact execution state
Use exact status words:
- inspected
- changed locally
- verified locally
- committed
- pushed
- blocked
Output Format
SURFACE
- repo
- branch
- requested mode
EVIDENCE
- failing command / diff / test
ACTION
- what changed
STATUS
- inspected / changed locally / verified locally / committed / pushed / blocked
Pitfalls
- do not work from stale memory when the live repo state can be read
- do not widen a narrow fix into repo-wide churn
- do not use destructive git commands
- do not ignore unrelated local work
Verification
- the response names the proving command or test
- git-related work names the repo path and branch
- any push claim includes the target branch and exact result