BERORINPO db7f2a6fd5 fix(skills): move top-level origin frontmatter key under metadata
The official Agent Skills spec (agentskills.io/specification) whitelists exactly
6 top-level frontmatter keys (name/description/license/compatibility/metadata/
allowed-tools). A top-level `origin` key fails the official validator
(anthropics/skills quick_validate.py ALLOWED_PROPERTIES; skills-ref validate).

This moves `origin: X` -> `metadata.origin: X` across the canonical skills/
tree, preserving each value verbatim. Frontmatter-only, minimal diff.

- 251 SKILL.md updated (242 new metadata block, 9 appended to existing metadata)
- origin values preserved verbatim (verified 251/251)
- YAML validated on all changed files
- scoped to canonical skills/ only (docs/<lang> translations + tool mirrors
  .cursor/.kiro/.agents left untouched; presumably regenerated from canonical)

Addresses #2233
2026-06-11 21:12:21 +09:00

2.9 KiB

name, description, metadata
name description metadata
terminal-ops Evidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified.
origin
ECC

Terminal Ops

Use this when the user wants real repo execution: run commands, inspect git state, debug CI or builds, make a narrow fix, and report exactly what changed and what was verified.

This skill is intentionally narrower than general coding guidance. It is an operator workflow for evidence-first terminal execution.

Skill Stack

Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:

  • verification-loop for exact proving steps after changes
  • tdd-workflow when the right fix needs regression coverage
  • security-review when secrets, auth, or external inputs are involved
  • github-ops when the task depends on CI runs, PR state, or release status
  • knowledge-ops when the verified outcome needs to be captured into durable project context

When to Use

  • user says "fix", "debug", "run this", "check the repo", or "push it"
  • the task depends on command output, git state, test results, or a verified local fix
  • the answer must distinguish changed locally, verified locally, committed, and pushed

Guardrails

  • inspect before editing
  • stay read-only if the user asked for audit/review only
  • prefer repo-local scripts and helpers over improvised ad hoc wrappers
  • do not claim fixed until the proving command was rerun
  • do not claim pushed unless the branch actually moved upstream

Workflow

1. Resolve the working surface

Settle:

  • exact repo path
  • branch
  • local diff state
  • requested mode:
    • inspect
    • fix
    • verify
    • push

2. Read the failing surface first

Before changing anything:

  • inspect the error
  • inspect the file or test
  • inspect git state
  • use any already-supplied logs or context before re-reading blindly

3. Keep the fix narrow

Solve one dominant failure at a time:

  • use the smallest useful proving command first
  • only escalate to a bigger build/test pass after the local failure is addressed
  • if a command keeps failing with the same signature, stop broad retries and narrow scope

4. Report exact execution state

Use exact status words:

  • inspected
  • changed locally
  • verified locally
  • committed
  • pushed
  • blocked

Output Format

SURFACE
- repo
- branch
- requested mode

EVIDENCE
- failing command / diff / test

ACTION
- what changed

STATUS
- inspected / changed locally / verified locally / committed / pushed / blocked

Pitfalls

  • do not work from stale memory when the live repo state can be read
  • do not widen a narrow fix into repo-wide churn
  • do not use destructive git commands
  • do not ignore unrelated local work

Verification

  • the response names the proving command or test
  • git-related work names the repo path and branch
  • any push claim includes the target branch and exact result