mirror of
https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code.git
synced 2026-06-20 03:40:29 +08:00
6e2544ffa2
- agent.yaml: register epic-* commands (#2236) and vue-review (#2241) - package.json files: drop stray skills/ml-adoption-playbook entry (follows orphan-skill publish pattern; not in install-modules.json) - unicode-safety: strip decorative emoji from dashboard-web.js (#2100) and brand-discovery refs (#2221) to pass the CI gate - agent-compress: raise catalog token canary 5000 -> 6000 for the 67-agent catalog Full suite green (2836/2836).
45 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
45 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Module 20 — Positioning
|
|
|
|
> **Frameworks:** Dunford *Obviously Awesome* · Moore crossing-the-chasm template ·
|
|
> Jobs-to-be-done lens
|
|
>
|
|
> **Goal:** Define the brand's competitive frame — who it's for, what category it
|
|
> competes in, what it does uniquely, and why that matters to the target client.
|
|
> Output is the raw material for a positioning statement the brand can act on.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Raw
|
|
|
|
<!-- Verbatim quotes and examples. Record exact language. -->
|
|
|
|
### Who is the target client? (role, company type, situation)
|
|
|
|
### What category does the brand compete in? (how clients currently solve this problem)
|
|
|
|
### What makes the brand different from alternatives in that category?
|
|
|
|
### What does the target client care about most? (the value they get that others can't match)
|
|
|
|
### Competitive alternatives named by the founder (include "do nothing" / "hire in-house")
|
|
|
|
### Phrases or metaphors the founder uses naturally to describe what they do
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Synthesis
|
|
|
|
### Positioning statement draft (Dunford template)
|
|
> For **[target client]** who **[situation / JTBD]**, **[brand name]** is the
|
|
> **[category]** that **[unique value]**. Unlike **[alternatives]**, we
|
|
> **[key differentiator]**.
|
|
|
|
### Alternative framings (vary the category or the differentiator)
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
2. ### White-space hypothesis (what no competitor is claiming that this brand could own)
|
|
|
|
### Open questions / ambiguities
|
|
|
|
### Tensions with Module 10 Why (flag any contradictions for Module 90 reconciliation)
|