Add a repo-level supply-chain incident response playbook for npm/GitHub Actions package-registry incidents, anchored on the May 2026 TanStack compromise and prior Shai-Hulud-style npm incidents. - add `docs/security/supply-chain-incident-response.md` with exposure checks, immediate response steps, workflow rules, publication rules, and escalation triggers - link the playbook from `SECURITY.md` - reject `pull_request_target` workflows that restore or save shared dependency caches - add a regression test for the new `pull_request_target + actions/cache` guardrail Validation: - node tests/ci/validate-workflow-security.test.js (12 passed, 0 failed) - node scripts/ci/validate-workflow-security.js (validated 7 workflow files) - npx markdownlint-cli 'SECURITY.md' 'docs/security/supply-chain-incident-response.md' - npx markdownlint-cli '**/*.md' --ignore node_modules - git diff --check - node tests/run-all.js (2377 passed, 0 failed) - GitHub CI for #1848 green across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS No release, tag, npm publish, plugin tag, marketplace submission, or announcement was performed.
4.9 KiB
Supply-Chain Incident Response
This playbook is the ECC operator runbook for npm, GitHub Actions, and cross-ecosystem package-registry incidents. It is intentionally conservative: registry signatures, provenance, and trusted publishing are useful signals, but they do not prove that the workflow executed the intended code path.
Current External Trigger
As of 2026-05-13, the active incident class is the May 2026 TanStack npm supply-chain compromise:
- TanStack reported 84 malicious versions across 42
@tanstack/*packages, published on 2026-05-11 between 19:20 and 19:26 UTC. - GitHub advisory
GHSA-g7cv-rxg3-hmpx/CVE-2026-45321describes install-time malware that harvests cloud credentials, GitHub tokens, npm credentials, Vault tokens, Kubernetes tokens, and SSH private keys. - The attack chain combined
pull_request_target, GitHub Actions cache poisoning across a fork/base trust boundary, and OIDC token extraction from a GitHub Actions runner. - npm trusted publishing/provenance can confirm a package came from a bound CI identity. It cannot by itself prove that the CI cache, lifecycle scripts, or publish path were safe.
Primary references:
- https://tanstack.com/blog/npm-supply-chain-compromise-postmortem
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g7cv-rxg3-hmpx
- https://tanstack.com/blog/incident-followup
- https://docs.npmjs.com/trusted-publishers/
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2025/09/23/widespread-supply-chain-compromise-impacting-npm-ecosystem
ECC Exposure Check
Run this before a release candidate, after a broad dependency bump, and after any package-registry incident.
rg -n '(@tanstack|mistralai|uipath|opensearch|guardrails|axios)' \
package.json package-lock.json .opencode/package.json .opencode/package-lock.json
npm ci --ignore-scripts
npm audit signatures
npm audit --audit-level=high
node scripts/ci/validate-workflow-security.js
node tests/scripts/npm-publish-surface.test.js
node tests/run-all.js
If a search hit appears only in documentation examples, note it in the release evidence but do not rotate credentials for a docs-only reference.
Immediate Response
If ECC or a maintainer machine installed a known-bad package version:
- Stop the host from publishing or deploying.
- Preserve evidence before cleanup:
- package manager command history;
package-lock.json,pnpm-lock.yaml, oryarn.lock;- CI run URLs and runner logs;
- npm package versions and tarball integrity hashes;
- outbound network logs where available.
- Treat the install host as compromised if lifecycle scripts may have run.
- Rotate every credential reachable by the process:
- npm automation tokens and maintainer tokens;
- GitHub PATs, fine-grained tokens, deploy keys, and Actions secrets;
- cloud credentials, Vault tokens, Kubernetes service-account tokens, SSH
keys, and local
.npmrctokens; - any MCP, plugin, or harness credentials available in environment variables or user-scope config.
- Purge GitHub Actions caches for affected repositories.
- Reinstall from a clean environment with
npm ci --ignore-scriptsfirst. - Re-enable lifecycle scripts only after the dependency tree and package versions are pinned to known-clean releases.
GitHub Actions Rules
ECC enforces these rules through scripts/ci/validate-workflow-security.js:
- privileged workflows must not checkout untrusted PR refs;
- workflows with write permissions must use
npm ci --ignore-scripts; - workflows with
id-token: writemust not restore or save shared dependency caches; - workflows that run
npm auditmust also runnpm audit signatures; pull_request_targetworkflows must not restore or save shared dependency caches.
Treat any violation as a release blocker.
Publication Rules
Before tagging or publishing ECC:
- Verify there is no unexpected dependency on packages in the active advisory.
- Use a clean checkout or throwaway worktree for release commands.
- Do not mix PR/test caches with publish jobs.
- Keep
id-token: writelimited to release workflows that do not use shared dependency caches. - Prefer trusted publishing/provenance where supported, while still requiring local package-surface tests and registry-signature verification.
- Confirm npm dist-tag, GitHub release, Claude plugin, Codex plugin, and OpenCode package state in the publication-readiness evidence document.
When To Escalate
Escalate to a maintainer security review before any release or merge if:
- a dependency lockfile references a package named in an active advisory;
- a workflow combines
pull_request_targetwith dependency installation, cache restore/save, PR-head checkout, or write permissions; - a release workflow combines
id-token: writewith shared cache usage; - a publish workflow uses a long-lived npm token without a documented reason;
- AgentShield, GitGuardian, Dependabot, npm audit, or registry-signature checks disagree.